Drill, baby, drill
Or perhaps I am, on a smaller scale - Alaska. It doesn't take a rocket scientist (or a governor or a senator) to see that bringing oil drilling to Alaska is bringing money into many families there; families that feel they need a break, after all. They want to prosper and the best and most efficient way to do that is to open up Alaska for drilling and bring in the money to do it from our collective national wallet. It's understandable. Inefficient and totally wreckless, but understandable.
Let me segway here and call a spade a spade. The only reason Palin is on the ticket is to get that all important sound bite and push this agenda. I can smell a soundbite of the day from a mile off and she's had some pretty good ones. Can Obama really attack her? No. He can't treat her like she's at the top of the ticket, but she can snipe as much as possible with a smile on her face. Believe me, I understand, McCain's playing the politic game. I really thought better of him until now, but that's another blog for another time. The point is, no matter how good she looks in lipstick, It doesn't mask the greater issue - should we be talking hockey or about whether it's wise to put money into more oil in our own back yard?
Wouldn't it be much more reasonable to go over to alternative an renewable energy resources now? to put all that tax money to finding new and efficient ways to power all of our gadgets and gizmos? There is not enough oil to last us anyway, why bother? Oh, so we can end our dependency on the middle east? Aren't we already IN the middle east? That would have been a great idea - about ten years ago when we weren't so ENTRENCHED in the middle east. - just not billions of dollars later.
So the basic premise from the republican platform as I understand it is this - go to the middle east, cause some havoc, cut all of our international ties to play cowboys and indians, spend all our money, then say we don't need what they got and then cause some more havoc over here by electing a beauty queen vice president, spending more money on oil platforms that may add to our problem of global warming and make MY state and coastal city, along with a whole bunch of ther cities on the east and west coast uninhabitable, so that Alaskans can go ice fishing with a full bank account?!? COME ON!!!! Really?!?
Look, let me put it to you this way - there is an opportunity for drilling in Alaska. There is further opportunity for jobs in Alaska, fiscal growth, etc.... but what about the other coastal areas? Should New York, Miami, Louisianna and every other coastal city just suck it up and watch as our communities drown so that the Alaskans can have their fiscal growth?
50 years, people. That's the current projection for the melt down. To put it in a much more direct analogy - picture you have 50 years to live. You have 50 candy bars. For every candy bar you bite into, you take off one year of life. How many do you plan to eat? None? Just one won't hurt? Well, that's how I feel about drilling. It will most definately hurt us in the long run. If we want energy independence, we need the discipline for it, not more of the oil that has gotten us into the global warming predicament that we've known about since the 1930's.
And, on the heels of Governor Palin swooping back into Alaska and giving her speech (for a second time) here is a headline from the Herald Tribune: SEX, DRUG USE AND GRAFT ALLEGED IN US INTERIOR DEPARTMENT
" As Congress prepares to debate expansion of drilling in taxpayer owned coastal waters, the Interior Department agency that collects oil and gas royalties has been caught up in a wide ranging ethics scandal including allegations of financial self dealing, accepting gifts from energy companies, cocaine use and sexual misconduct."
Oil people and government literally in bed together? Guess this gives a new meaning to "drill baby drill."
So sorry guys, but I'm not bending over for easy access on this one.

Help



